Marlis Petersen - Soprano
Press
- Lulu (Lulu), Metropolitan Opera New York, Mai 2010
- Hamlet (Ophelia), Metropolitan Opera New York, März 2010
- Medea (Medea), Wiener Staatsoper, Februar 2010
- Die Zauberflöte (Pamina), Festival d'Aix-en-Provence, Juli 2009
- Orlando Paladino (Angelica), Berliner Staatsoper, Mai 2009
- Lulu, Lyric Opera Chicago, November 2008
- La grande Magia (Marta), Semperoper Dresden, Mai 2008
- Phädra (Aphrodite), Staatsoper unter den Linden, Berlin September 2007
- Die Fledermaus, Chicago Opera House, Dezember 2006
- Die Entführung aus dem Serail (Konstanze), Théâtre de la Monnaie Bruxelles, September 2006
- Il Re Pastore, Salzburger Festspiele, Juli 2006
- Die Vögel, Grand Théâtre de Genève, Januar 2004
- Ariadne auf Naxos (Zerbinetta), Royal Opera House London, September 2002
- Lulu, Wiener Staatsoper, Februar 2002
Lulu (Lulu), Metropolitan Opera New York, Mai 2010
«Any “Lulu” is equally dependent on the singer in the title role. In the German soprano Marlis Petersen, the Met had a charismatic, technically assured protagonist. That Ms. Petersen’s Lulu was rarely seductive in any genuine sense seemed to be precisely her point: more often than not, she was both a scarred adolescent fascinated with the powers of her sublime figure and face and an amoral kitten prone to remorselessly raking everything within reach. Her wasted placidity in the tragic final scene was deeply affecting.»
Steve Smith, The New York Times, 09.05.2010«Marlis Petersen is completely at ease in Berg’s musical world. She not only sings all of Lulu’s ridiculously demanding music without apparent effort but moves with an amazing sensitivity to the musical gesture, and not just the gestures she is singing. I would like to think that this is the kind of performance Berg was looking for when he wrote so many picky stage directions in his score. Petersen’s Lulu feels almost like a choreographic realization of the music. ... Taking Lulu as a helpless victim of men, as Petersen does, makes us feel a little better about the gender politics of this piece, though I doubt Berg, much less his buddies Kraus and Weininger, would recognize this take on feminine nature. This approach makes her increased awareness in the second half something of a self-actualization, which again feels better to us now. (I think Petersen’s approach is entirely the right one for today, and I would probably be very uncomfortable with anything else, but I think we need to acknowledge that this piece has a shitload of gender trouble.)»
likelyimpossibilities.blogspot.com, 13.05.2010
